Depth of Field and Depth of Focus
Key Takeaways
- Depth of field is the object-space range judged acceptably sharp; depth of focus is the image-side tolerance to sensor-plane displacement.
- DOF depends on the circle-of-confusion criterion, magnification, aperture, and sharpness threshold; there is no context-free single value.
- In common thin-lens and hyperfocal models, far DOF is usually larger than near DOF; close-up work requires macro equations or measurement.
Two different depth ranges
Depth of field (DOF) is the object-space range around the focus plane that meets a stated sharpness criterion. Depth of focus is the image-side tolerance to moving the sensor plane along the optical axis while remaining within that criterion. DOF concerns object position; depth of focus concerns image-plane position.
Circle of confusion and common equations
An out-of-focus point forms a finite blur spot called the circle of confusion (CoC). It is considered acceptably sharp only when its diameter is below a chosen threshold c. In a paraxial thin-lens model with object distance u > f and focus distance s, hyperfocal distance is approximately H ≈ f²/(N c)+f; near limit Dn ≈ Hs/[H+(s−f)], and far limit Df ≈ Hs/[H−(s−f)] (a zero or negative denominator means the far limit is treated as infinity). DOF is Df−Dn. For close-up or high magnification, use macro equations or a measured MTF target instead.
How do parameters affect DOF?
At the same framing and CoC criterion, stopping down (increasing N) usually increases DOF. A shorter focal length also often increases DOF, but comparisons change if camera distance is adjusted to preserve framing. Focusing farther away generally increases DOF. Sensor format alone does not determine DOF: the chosen CoC threshold, output size, and viewing conditions matter.
Why is far DOF often larger?
In the common hyperfocal approximation, the denominator for the near limit is H+(s−f), while the far-limit denominator is H−(s−f). The latter is smaller, placing the far limit farther from focus; this is the usual basis of the rule “far DOF is greater than near DOF.” Near the hyperfocal distance, the far limit tends to infinity. Macro work, high magnification, asymmetric lenses, or an MTF-defined criterion can depart from this simple rule.
Focus tolerance and assembly
Paraxial image-side depth of focus is often on the order of N·c, with the coefficient depending on the definition, one-sided versus total range, wavelength, and diffraction criterion. Small pixels, high resolution, and fast apertures typically demand tighter sensor flatness, lens tilt, and active-focus control. A useful acceptance test specifies distance, aperture, spatial frequency, and minimum MTF rather than simply requiring “enough DOF.”
Related Products
Application Scenarios
Related Topics